| |
|
SUMMARY
OF THE FINAL 2005-2006 BUDGET AGREEMENT
(This was originally written for the April 15, 2005
issue of the Friday Fax from Albany)
NOW
THERE’S A BUDGET:
Over
the last two weeks in which the Governor had to make decisions about
whether to approve or veto portions of the Legislature’s agreed
upon budget, negotiations between the two houses and the Governor
took place. And by the time the Governor’s 10 day period had
expired on Tuesday, he and Legislature agreed to some changes to
the budget the Legislature passed on March 31st, averting what would
surely have been a showdown of sorts. This avoided the uncharted
waters that have come about as a result of the Court of Appeals’
decision in December, stripping the Legislature of much of its authority
when it comes to the budget process.
Aid
to Localities – The Legislature’s agreement
to restore $4.3 million of last year’s $7.7 million cut in
local assistance remained intact as the Governor reviewed this,
and many other Legislative changes. In addition, there has been
the official approval of the $24 million enhancement of Article
31clinic rates and the $6.5 million increase for supported housing
stipends. Though this is all positive news, unfortunately, it still
leaves in place the $3.9 million in local assistance cuts for this
year. Now that the budget process is over, we will turn our advocacy
to the Executive, Division of the Budget and the Office of Mental
Health to monitor the $3.9 million cut and the $4.3 million in restorations.
Medicaid
and Family Health Plus - MHANYS has worked closely with
a coalition of organizations concerned about the impact of changes
in Medicaid to consumers called Medicaid Matters. Among the issues
we worked with Medicaid Matters on was the effort to maintain or
restore benefits under the Family Health Plus program. While we
were successful in staving off the elimination of mental health
benefits that were proposed by the Governor, the final agreement
includes co-payment increases for physician visits to $5, an increase
in co-payments for generic drugs to $3, an increase in co-payments
for brand-name drugs to $6, and an increase in co-payments for hospital
visits to $250. It is interesting to note here that it appears that
these co-payment increases will generate very little in terms of
savings for the state. However, savings to the state will be realized
when these co-payment increases effectually reduce the utilization
of services by people on Family Health Plus who can no longer afford
to make these co-payments. Also related to decreased utilization,
the budget agreement also required that potential enrollees in Family
Health Plus cannot have had coverage for 9 months prior to their
enrollment in the system. However, this could increase long-term
healthcare costs due to the fact that people will be sicker when
they eventually get treatment, rather than practicing preventative
medicine which costs significantly less.
Hospital
Closure Commission - It appears that a Hospital Closure
Commission will move forward in an effort to ‘right-size’
the current network of hospitals throughout New York. We are pleased
that consumers will be part of this commission, and that the Legislature
will have the authority to reject the commission’s finding.
However, we have serious concerns about moving forward with hospital
closures as concurrent discussions regarding closure of state-operated
psychiatric centers may be happening as well. If such PC closures
are going to happen in the future, individuals with mental health
needs who require inpatient hospitalization will increasingly be
relying upon these private hospitals. Discussion about the future
of these hospitals must include discussion and input from consumers
regarding the future of the mental health system as well.
Preferred
Drug Program - While we have not read through all the
amendments passed by the Legislature and approved by the Governor
this week with a fine toothed comb, we understand that there are
no significant changes to the Preferred Drug Program (PDP) agreement
reached by the Legislature 2 weeks ago. Therefore, the PDP will
take effect 1) with an exemption for all atypical anti-psychotic
and anti-depressant medications, 2) an option for other therapeutic
classes of mental health medications to be exempted as well, 3)
doctors will be given the final say as to whether a patient will
be prescribed a ‘non-preferred’ drug or not, and 4)
inclusion of consumer representation on the Pharmacy and Therapeutics
(P & T) Committee, which will decide which drugs are ‘preferred.’
We
still have serious concerns about 1) how individuals taking other
mental health medications (i.e. mood stabilizers) will be impacted,
2) how individuals with co-occurring mental health and physical
health needs will be effected, 3) how the Clinical Drug Review Program
(CDRP) will impact individuals with mental health needs, 4) whether
the process doctors must use to get approval to prescribe a non-preferred
drug will prove too time consuming for doctors to pursue prior approval,
5) the accessibility of mental health medications that come in different
delivery modes (injectibles or patches), and 6) the state’s
intention to contract with an organization in Oregon with questionable
practices to determine which drugs will be on the Preferred Drug
List (PDL).
Adult
Homes - Lastly, as part of the final, agreed upon budget,
an SSI increase for adult home residents was included as well, which
will take place over the next 2 years. This increase will include
an increase in the Personal Needs Allowance that residents get to
spend as they wish. Many residents who attended the recent ‘Speak
Out’ in Albany spoke of how they would use this money to buy
things like clothes that actually fit them. The agreement also includes
additional resources for case management as well. We are appreciative
of the Governor and the Legislature for identifying the need and
providing resources for adult home residents. We will continue to
advocate for additional resources for resident oriented programs
that will promote independence, including activities of daily living
skill training, education programs and vocational programs.
|
|