|
MHANYS'
2009 LEGISLATIVE AGENDA
Summary of Legislative Initiatives
Proposed
Budget-Related Items:
-
Restoration to SSI Cuts
- Restoration
to the Proposed One Percent Cut to Mental Health COLA for this
year and future years
- Restoration
of the full COLA for Mental Health
- Maintain
current timetable for implementing the SHU Bill
- Restore
funding for anti-depressant carve out and insure full access for
all mental health medications
- Enhance
funding for Suicide Prevention and Geriatric Mental Health
- Continue
Capital Construction for Housing Beds and advocating for one quarter
of new beds be dedicated to adult home residents
- Advocate
for utilizing existing funding streams for Youth in Transition
Legislative
Actions:
- Permanent
Extension of Timothy’s Law
- Include
PTSD coverage in Timothy’s Law
- Elimination
of Discriminatory DSS Law regarding Parental Rights to Individuals
with Psychiatric Disabilities
- Amend
Sex Offender Legislation to Insure that Offenders are no longer
housed in Psychiatric Facilities
- Housing
Wait List Bill/Housing for Adult Home Residents
- Tax
Check Off Bill for Greater Public Awareness of Mental Health Issues
- Mandatory
Suicide Education Training Bill
- The
Behavioral Health and Long-Term Care Act of 2009
Supplemental Security Income (SSI) Cut
Issue: The governor plans to cut the state portion
of the Supplemental Security Income (SSI) Benefit. SSI provides
cash assistance to the aged, blind and disabled, and is administered
by the Social Security Administration. New York provides an optional
state supplement, which it has not increased in over 20 years. The
federal benefit itself is adjusted annually to keep pace with inflationary
trends.
The
budget reduces the 2009 state benefit for SSI recipients living
in the community by $24 for individuals and $28 for couples per
month. The governor’s budget briefs justify the reduction
given this year’s federal portion increase of 5.8 percent.
The governor’s proposal would bring the state’s supplement
down to $63 for an individual living alone; $8.91 less than the
1986 level.
For
people unable to work because of a disability, SSI is their total
monthly income through which all daily living expenses must be met,
including the basics of shelter, food and out-of-pocket medical
expenses.
Although
the federal government has determined an inflationary trend factor
of 5.8 percent, New York is proposing to apply a negative 28 percent
“deflationary” trend. This proposal is grossly out of
step with current economic realities of people with disabilities
trying to maintain the most basic, subsistence lifestyle.
Ideally,
New York would match the federal trend factor adjustment, recognizing
the steady increases in living costs each year. But advocates have
worked with futility at winning any increase in the $87 state supplement
for over 20 years. Now the governor wants to lower it to $63. This
is unacceptable.
Recommendation(s):
- Restore
the proposed cuts to SSI
Permanent Extension & Expansion of Timothy’s Law
Issue:
Establishing Mental Health Parity through the passage
of Timothy’s Law represents an historic landmark in the advancement
of mental health treatment access.
Due
to Timothy’s Law, much of the landscape has changed for the
positive for hundreds of thousand of New Yorkers with psychiatric
disabilities as well as for their loved ones. In December of this
year, this legislation is proposed to sunset.
As
proven over the last two years, the fears of employers and insurers
of skyrocketing rates have been completely unfounded. All concerns
about the legislation have been addressed and the first two years
of implementation have been very successful. There is no reason
not to make this law permanent. We need your support and leadership
to insure that Timothy’s Law becomes permanent.
While
making the law permanent we also need to expand its coverage in
two critical areas. Unfortunately, Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder
(PTSD) is not included among the biologically based illnesses that
are covered under the new law. The exclusion of PTSD negatively
impacts returning veterans, children and adults who have suffered
sexual abuse and many others who have developed this illness due
to trauma. PTSD is marked by clear biological changes as well as
psychological symptoms.
Recommendation(s):
1.
To insure that Timothy’s Law becomes permanent in New York
by supporting (S1646/A5659).
2. Assure that the permanent bill includes coverage of Post Traumatic
Stress Disorder (PTSD) by supporting (S.185/A.4572).
Cost of Living Adjustment Cut
Issue:
The 2009 -10 Executive Budget recommends $427 million
in cuts to Mental Hygiene that would be achieved through a number
of provisions including the deferring of planned cost of living
adjustments (COLAs) for mental health workers for one year. This
is a critical issue because the failure to help mental health workers
keep pace with inflationary trends negatively impacts the recruitment
and retention of a quality workforce, and by extension a mentally
healthy New York.
Specifically,
the governor proposes to eliminate the planned 5.6 percent 2009-10
Cost-of-Living Adjustments (COLAs) for human service providers.
It is expected that approximately 5,500 providers statewide will
be impacted by this action representing a $93 million cut in the
salaries of the lowest paid tier of the mental health workforce.
Successful
recruitment and retention of qualified mental health care staff
requires that employers be able to offer wages at least commensurate
with entry-level, service industries. Their work is difficult, stressful
and highly necessary. A reasonable cost of living adjustment for
mental health workers has been neglected for far too long to halt
this important COLA at this juncture.
Recommendation(s):
MHANYS
urges the Legislature to reject this delay and assure that the originally
planned-for COLA be restored. Funding from the stimulus package
can be utilized to restore the COLA for Mental Health (approximately
$55 million).
Rights of Families with Psychiatric Disabilities
Issue:
The
Mental Health Association in New York State (MHANYS) working to
change New York’s child custody law to eliminate provisions
that discriminate against parents with psychiatric disabilities.
New
York State Social Services Law (SSL), subdivision 4 of §384-b
includes four grounds for permanently terminating parental rights.
Those grounds are:
1.
abandonment [384-b4(b)]
2. permanent neglect [384-b4(d)]
3. severe and repeated abuse [384-b4(e)]
4. The parents are presently and for the foreseeable future unable,
by reason of mental illness or mental retardation, to provide
proper and adequate care for a child who has been in the care
of an authorized agency for a period of one year. [384-b(4)(c)]
MHANYS
strongly opposes 384-b(4)(c) because:
-
It results in unnecessary separation trauma for children and disrupts
critical mother-child bonding in cases involving infants;
- it
is discriminatory;
- decisions
to terminate parental rights should be based on behavior and not
condition;
-
the substantive and procedural provisions are vague, subjective
and easily misapplied, thus undermining the required standard
of proof of clear and convincing evidence;
-
termination of parental rights (TPR) is a drastic, permanent measure,
severing forever a parent’s right to be a part of his or
her child’s life;
- this
statute was written prior to changes in mental health treatment
promoting recovery, and;
-
this statute is destructive public policy because parents are
afraid to seek treatment for fear of losing their children and
children are removed from families where there is no abuse or
neglect.
Historically,
parents with psychiatric disabilities have faced enormous societal
biases concerning their fitness to maintain parental relationships.
These biases continue to pervade the legal process. Stigmatizing
attitudes and beliefs are at the root of discriminatory policies.
We, as a state, cannot hope to eliminate these attitudes when the
foundational structure of our laws perpetuates this manner of viewing
people with disabilities. MHANYS is urging the New York State Legislature
to remove this and other discriminatory provisions in our laws.
Recommendation(s):
Support
S.2835(Huntley), which would eliminate paragraph (c) of SSL §384-b
(4) and all of Subdivision (6) of SSL §384-b and effectively
put an end to this discriminatory law.
Amend
Sex Offender Legislation
Issue:
We are well aware of our existing budget deficit and
the impact it will have to our entire state, but instead of just
advocating for more funding in difficult times, we have also identified
a funding stream that will help defray the cost of restoring initiatives
that have been cut.
Specifically,
we are referring to the Sex Offender Legislation that was signed
into law by former Governor Spitzer. This legislation is costing
New York over $50 million a year to house less then 200 sex offenders
in psychiatric facilities.
The
annual price of housing a committed sex offender averages more than
$200,000, compared with about $35,000 a year for keeping someone
in prison, because of the higher costs for programs, treatment and
supervised freedoms.
We
have long opposed this legislation because sex offenders should
not be housed in psychiatric facilities. Instead, offenders could
be housed on the grounds of correctional facilities. The public
would be better protected and the state would save a great deal
of money (that can go to community based care) by not having to
construct new facilities and beds on the grounds of psychiatric
facilities for this specific population.
Recommendation(s):
We
urge the Legislature to revisit the Sex Offender Program and end
the practice of housing sex offenders in state psychiatric facilities.
To house offenders on the grounds of correctional facilities saves
the state money and also provides greater protection to the community.
It is a common sense approach that should be embraced.
Housing Wait List/Housing for Adult Home Residents
Issue:
Safe, decent and affordable housing is a critical
component of recovery from mental illness, and is foundational in
a person’s life for establishing stability and independence.
Access to good housing is a fundamental problem for many people
with psychiatric disabilities. The limited supply of very-low-income
housing, the rising cost of rental market housing and discrimination
leave these individuals with few, if any, choices for appropriate
housing.
Although
all would agree that actual housing need exceeds currently proposed
remedies, there remains no reasonable measure to direct policymaking
and prioritize the use of finite resources. A comprehensive and
rational approach for addressing the need for mental health housing
will ultimately depend on some means of estimating the true scope
and nature of this problem.
A
sound housing policy and plan for people with psychiatric disabilities
should be informed and directed by a realistic understanding of
the true need. Tracking the number of people with mental illness
who are in need of appropriate housing seems like a reasonable place
to begin. Maintaining a registry of housing need is not merely a
means of assessing volume, but would provide invaluable information
about where housing is needed and in what format.
Recommendation(s):
1.
Support legislative language that would direct the development
of a meaningful method of assessing the real housing need for
people with mental illness through a Housing Wait List Bill (S.284).
2.
Continue capital construction for housing and set aside 25% of
new beds for adult home residents. Adult home residents with psychiatric
disabilities have had concerns with the quality of care in these
homes. Residents must have a safe place to live to help in their
recovery.
Anti-Stigma & Public Awareness of Mental Health Issues
Issue:
Stigmatization of people with mental disorders has
persisted throughout history. It is manifested by bias, distrust,
stereotyping, fear, embarrassment, anger, and/or avoidance. Stigma
leads others to avoid living, socializing or working with, renting
to, or employing people with mental disorders, especially severe
disorders such as schizophrenia. Stigma reduces patients’
access to resources and opportunities (e.g., housing, jobs) and
leads to low self-esteem, isolation, and hopelessness. It deters
the public from seeking, and wanting to pay for, care. In its most
overt and egregious form, stigma results in outright discrimination
and abuse. More tragically, it deprives people of their dignity
and interferes with their full participation in society.
For
someone with a mental illness, the consequences of stigma can be
devastating — in some cases, worse than the illness itself.
Some of the harmful effects of stigma include:
- Trying
to pretend nothing is wrong
- Refusal
to seek treatment
- Rejection
by family and friends
- Work
problems or discrimination
- Difficulty
finding housing
- Being
subjected to physical violence or harassment
- Inadequate
health insurance coverage of mental illnesses
Recommendation(s):
Support
the reintroduction of S.8662 (Morahan)/A 6826-A (Rivera P), which
would establish a gift for eliminating the stigma relating to mental
illness on personal income tax returns. The bill would also establish
the mental illness anti-stigma fund into which such gifts shall
be deposited and directs the monies in such fund be used by the
Office of Mental Health (OMH) to provide grants to organizations
dedicated to eliminating the stigma attached to mental illness and
those with mental health needs.
Suicide Prevention
Issue:
Suicide is now the third leading cause of death among
young New Yorkers ages 15-24, according to the National Center for
Health Statistics. Numerous studies have upheld the efficacy of
suicide call-in centers at preventing suicide when call takers are
properly trained.
Statistical
trends like these have led MHANYS to focus suicide prevention advocacy
on teens and college students. The college campus setting provides
an ideal academic structure for proper training to occur among students
already vested in human service vocations among students pursuing
human service courses of study.
Since
suicide is the second leading cause of death among college students,
it makes sense that college campuses be equipped to provide emergency
suicide hotlines for students and perhaps the larger community.
Recommendation(s):
1.
Support legislation to expand the number of available volunteers
at suicide prevention hotline centers through the use of college
students majoring in related human services fields of study.
2.
Enhance funding for Suicide Prevention and Geriatric Mental Health
Access to Medication
Issue:
Cost-containment can at times be necessary but, should
not cause us to attempt saving in areas that 1) save relatively
little; 2) are counter-therapeutic for patients; and 3) can have
a very costly impact. All of these criteria are met in the governor’s
proposal to limit access to medication for people with psychiatric
disabilities.
Again
this year the state Executive Budget has called for the exclusion
of anti-depressants from the “carve-out” of mental health
medications in the Medicaid Preferred Drug List. These budget provisions
are intended to save the state money by limiting the number of anti-depressants
that Medicaid will pay for to a select few. In fact this provision
would only save the state $3.3 million of its $13.7 billion budget,
or .0002 percent.
New
medications combined with expert pharmacology benefit thousands.
Limiting coverage to a few medications that are “tried and
true”, and work with most people, freezes medical and pharmacological
advances at a point some twenty years ago. People suffering with
severe mental illnesses should not be deprived of what research
and technology can now provide. Limiting coverage is counter- therapeutic.
New
medications introduced in the last decade represent a major advance
in the effective treatment of mental illnesses. Generally, the newer
medications are more effective at treating various mental disorders
(particularly schizophrenia and major depression), with a noticeable
reduction in, or absence of, the adverse side effects often associated
with the older generation medications. More specifically, newer
generation drugs feature real-world effectiveness, ease of dosing,
and improved safety.
Timely
access to the most effective drug therapies can reduce the need
for inpatient treatment and minimize the disabling effects of severe
illnesses and disorders, such as schizophrenia and major depressive
disorder. Furthermore, the milder side effects of many of the newer
medications may ensure better compliance with therapy. Together,
these factors can result in marked improvement in the productivity
and quality of life for both the consumer and the consumer's family.
Limitations can be costly in many ways.
Finally,
past efforts to limit access to just a few medications have allowed
for the physician to prevail in authorization denials. In reality,
this provision detracts from doctor-patient face-to-face time and
frustrates psychiatrists with yet another regulatory burden within
the Medicaid program.
Recommendation(s):
MHANYS
opposes cost-containment proposals that rely on limiting access
to the full range of medication options currently available and
shown to have added therapeutic value.
Special Housing Units (SHU Exclusion Bill)
Issue:
MHANYS vigorously objects to the Executive Budget’s
proposal to defer the implementation date of the SHU bill an additional
three years – until 2014. We also object to the proposed Article
VII amendment to the original legislation that would omit approximately
50% of the SHU beds from the scope of the bill. Finally, we oppose
the cutting of the minimal training included for correction officers.
Last
year, the State Office of Mental Health reported that the number
of persons receiving mental health services in the state correctional
system had grown in absolute numbers and accounted for 13.5% of
the overall prison population. This occurred at a time when the
overall prison population had showed a measurable decline. We also
know that individuals with psychiatric disabilities have a difficult
time while incarcerated and wind up in solitary confinement in special
housing units in numbers far greater than their percentage of the
total prison population.
The
social isolation and sensory deprivation associated with solitary
confinement exacerbates psychiatric symptoms which can lead to psychotic
decompensation, injury to self or others, and on occasion, to suicide.
Arguably, locking up persons with a serious mental illness in solitary
confinement, usually for extended periods of time, constitutes cruel
and unusual punishment. At the very least, it represents an egregious
example of deep-rooted patterns of mistreatment and neglect for
the well-being of vulnerable and sick human beings.
Recommendation(s):
Reject
the Executive Budget proposal to:
-
Defer the effective date of the SHU bill an additional three years
– until 2014;
- Amend
the original legislation that would omit approximately 50% of
the SHU beds;
- Cut
the minimal training included for correction officers.
Geriatric Mental Health & Long Term Care
Issue:
According to the American Association of Geriatric
Psychiatry, nearly 20 percent of people 55 years of age and older
experience mental disorders that are not part of normal aging. Studies
show, however, that mental disorders in older adults are underreported.
It is estimated that only half of older adults who acknowledge mental
health problems receive treatment from any health care provider,
and only a fraction of those receive specialty mental health services
(3 percent). This rate of utilization is lower than for any other
adult age group. Intertwined with mental health are issues of chemical
dependency. According to the New York State Office of Alcohol and
Substance Abuse Services (OASAS), alcohol and substance abuse among
the elderly is a hidden national epidemic. It is believed that about
10% of this country’s population abuses alcohol, but surveys
revealed that as many as 17% of the over-65 adults have an alcohol-abuse
problem. The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation suggest an escalation
nationally of the approximately 1.7 million current substance dependent
and abusing adults over age 50 in 2001 to 4.4 million by 2020.
Of
particular concern to MHANYS at this time is the high prevalence
of mental illness among the elderly who also have long term care
needs. A large proportion of older adults receiving, or in need
of, long-term care in New York State have diagnosable behavioral
disorders such as depression, anxiety disorders, psychotic conditions,
or substance use problems. These conditions may or may not co-occur
with dementia, most commonly Alzheimer’s disease.
New
York needs a process for coordinating health and mental health policy
in the context of long term care reform efforts. It is critical
for New York State to address the behavioral health needs of people
who are receiving, who meet the criteria for receiving, or who are
at-risk of needing long-term care and to address the behavioral
health needs of their family caregivers.
Recommendation(s):
MHANYS
supports “The Behavioral Health and Long-Term Care Act of
2009”, which would establish a coordinated approach to addressing
the long term care and mental health needs of thousands of elderly
New Yorkers.
|